Re: [boost] Two mqtt libraries

On Sun, Jul 28, 2024, 6:57 PM Takatoshi Kondo via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

If the formal reviews are conducted separately, the first review's outcome shouldn't affect the second one. If this independence is guaranteed, I think it would be fair.

Let me explain an unfair hypothetical scenario example: The first library is accepted, but the second one is rejected because "Boost already has that functionality." This would be unfair.

It would be unfair. One solution would be for people to submit review votes privately. And having the results published only after both are reviewed.