Robert wrote:
I notice that a couple of libraries submitted for formal review haven't submitted to the incubator. This concerns me as one of the motivations of the incubator was to make for information available and avoid a scenario whereby libraries "snuck though" the review process and ended up having some surprises which I was unhappy about.
Could you elaborate on your concerns? If a library is listed on the review schedule, has a link to source, has a link to documentation, and has had a mailing list thread requesting feedback: What information is not available to reviewers? Glen -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/http-Boost-Http-formal-review-is-finished... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.