22 May
2022
22 May
'22
2:41 a.m.
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 8:59 PM Peter Dimov wrote:
Compilers apparently are warning on the use of 0 as a null pointer constant, suggesting we use nullptr instead. But compilers don't know that we support C++03 where nullptr isn't a thing.
ifdef-ing every use of nullptr is unwieldy, so maybe we need BOOST_NULLPTR added to Boost.Config? That would expand to nullptr when it's supported, and 0 otherwise.
Sounds good to me. Glen