Re: [boost] [c++11]

On 2013-06-18 21:13, Thomas Heller wrote:

Am 18.06.2013 21:09 schrieb "Jonathan Wakely" :

...

...

On 18 June 2013 19:46, Thomas Heller wrote:

...

...

I will support you in your efforts for going for a C++11 based solution under the condition that boost will move on and deprecate all libraries that will be unusable with a C++03 compiler.

Huh? You're suggesting deprecating C++11-only libraries before they're even added?

The other way around. Move on with C++11 and get rid of the C++03 cruft.

Ah, that makes more sense. Working on a C++11 library myself, I was trying to wrap my head around it and failed :-) The really interesting question is though: How about the next few years, when C++14 and C++17 enter the stage? For instance, I'd really love to use static_if as soon as it is available :-)