Re: [boost] [gsoc-2013] Boost.Expected

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

Le 24/04/13 18:02, Gottlob Frege a écrit :

One thing I missed in this conversation:

...

Are we considering the Alexandrescu behaviour of throwing in the destructor if the expected<> has not been read?

Why would you want to that?

I didn't say I did, but some might. And the Alexandrescu version (which was referenced as one design) works that way.

...

I was imagining just an excepted class. I forgot about the novel throwing behaviour.

This will correspond to expected_or_error.

I'm hoping for just one class, not multiple.

Best, Vicente

Tony