On 11 February 2018 at 17:01, Edward Diener via Boost wrote: You are saying then that what you mean by "C++03 is not supported" is
compiling in C++03 mode. No, I mean that if the test suite (of a library) cannot compile with C++03,
one has to qualify the library as non-C++03 (even if it might on the
surface look as if the library (not the test-suite) *does* compile with
C++03). If I cannot test it, it's not vali(date)d code. ... But I hope you realize that is different from saying that C++03
libraries, meaning libraries not using C++11or above constructs or
libraries, should not be part of Boost. I agree with you, I don't think they should not be part of boost. However,
I do think that to at least support moves (not only the semantics) (for all
libraries) when compiled with C++11 or above, should be on the road-map,
and then of course CXXD (so I get the std::-equivalent of the library in
the standard I'm compiling the library with).
degski