Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Review

12 Mar 2017

      On 3/11/17 4:32 PM, Barrett Adair via Boost wrote:
...
safe_base & operator--(int){ // post decrement
    safe_base old_t = *this;
    --(*this);
    return old_t;
}
If I'm reading correctly, this is UB (and likely a segfault).
correct - fixed
I do think this library might be much more useful with floating point
support, if it is eventually added.
indeed.

Want to voluteer?

I'm sure that floating point would end up a lot more complex than first 
meets the eye though.

Robert Ramey