Re: [boost] [contract] help marking regression test expected failures

On 10/25/2017 4:21 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost wrote:

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:

...

El 25/10/2017 a las 16:56, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:

...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:

...

On 10/25/2017 3:09 AM, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:

...

El 25/10/2017 a las 1:16, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:

...

https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/develop/status/explicit-failures-mark...

Doesn't math the expected failures I see on the regression report: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/contract.html

Your changes haven been added to develop but not merged to the release version of explicit-failures-markup.xml yet.

Why would not an explicit-failures-markup.xml for 'develop' be applied to 'develop' regression testing ?

Correct. I am only looking at develop regression testing so the fact that explicit-failures-markup.xml is not merged to master/release is not the problem.

I *think* the xml version from master is used regardless of whether the reports corresponds to develop or master.

You are right! I just checked and the expected failures showing up on develop regression test report match 100% the markups of explicit-failures-markup.xml from *master* (instead of using the markups from develop).

Who can fix this? Making sure that explicit-failures-markup.xml from develop (not master) is used to markup the develop's regression tests.

The more general fix is to have the 'develop' regression tests use 'develop' everywhere and have the 'master' regression tests use 'master' everywhere.

Thank you. --Lorenzo