On 12 Jul 2014 at 21:54, Eric Niebler wrote:
I don't like differences between boost and std. But I also don't like breaking code. What do we want here?
I vote that boost::ref() becomes like std::ref(), but boost::proto::ref() remains like former boost::ref() for the 1.56 release. (Obviously implied in this is that boost::ref has two implementations, let's say boost::v1::ref() and boost::v2::ref(), and people choose which they like). I'd live with boost::ref() being the old behaviour this release but with the new boost::ref() available as boost::experimental::ref() or something, and for 1.57 boost::ref() becomes like std::ref(). Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/