Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries

degski wrote:

But, do the libs you quoted use std::optional and std::string_view (instead of their boost impersonations) when compiled with C++17?

Assuming a non-header-only library for the sake of going back onto the topic, this would create exactly the problems we've been discussing, if you link your C++17 code to the C++14-built library, or vice versa. For what gainz?