On 6 May 2015 at 23:31, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
It's time for somebody to say this, so I will do it. A C++ identifier name, as long as it is vaguely about what the functionality entails, is perfectly adequate. It does not have to satisfy everyone in the universe. Period !
I'm really surprised to read such a post on this forum.
Especially as it came from 2011 (http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Arguing-about-names-in-Boost-libra ries-td3473138.html). My email reader does this too sometimes, it magically resurrects an email deleted many years ago. I find it quirky, if slightly worrying that there must be a bug in there. At least deleting email with this old DOS era email program is many thousand times more likely to actually delete email compared to deleting email on gmail. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/