Re: [boost] [optional] using name boost::in_place -- need your opinion/advice

30 May 2016


      2016-05-30 12:46 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev :
...
...
2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev
:
...
The typed in-place
factories ruin the solution though, even if not used by
On Monday, 30 May 2016 13:45:28 MSK Krzysztof Czainski
wrote:
optional.
...
How so?
Typed in-place factory requires an explicit template parameter
to be specified, which is not achievable if in_place is an object.
Oh yeah. Too bad a variable template cannot be "overloaded" with the
non-template function object.