Re: [boost] [outcome] expected<T&>, result<T&>

Gottlob Frege wrote:

Some committee members want references to work one way, some want it to work another, ...

More specifically, some want in T t1, t2; expected e1( t1 ), e2( t2 ); e1 = e2; t1 to be assigned t2, whereas others want e1 to start pointing to t2. Similarly for e1 = t2.

so we should *never* support references.

Sounds like a good plan to me.