On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Michael Caisse via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 4/9/17 09:43, Bruno Dutra via Boost wrote:
Dear Community,
I'd like to formalize what has been known to many for some time now and request the formal review of Metal, a modern C++14 library designed to make template metaprogramming intuitive and effectively replace Boost.MPL. Klemens Morgenstern has kindly offered to manage the review process.
<snip>
There has been some talk/encouragement to review several of the competing metaprogramming libraries at the same time. Did this idea fall apart? http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
There just hasn't been a consensus yet on how to go about it AFAICT, but it does look like the discussions have stalled a little bit, so maybe this is a good opportunity to catch up.