Niall Douglas wrote
On 1 Sep 2014 at 15:41, Edward Diener wrote:
Do you intend this to be a separate library, or would it go into something like Boost.Container?
Not sure yet. My next goal is no-alloc promise-future, also based on spinlocks.
I don't intend to "finish" concurrent_unordered_map past what is already done, and I suspect no Boost library will accept it until I or someone else does.
I hope a GSoC student finishes it in 2015 or 2016, but for me it's enough for me to move on, so I am. You will hear what I will be doing next later today in fact.
What do you mean by "ready for review" exactly? Robert Ramey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/spinlock-concurrent-unordered-map-is-read... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.