Re: [boost] ABI issues with -std

On 08/20/18 11:32, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

...

...

As a slightly different variant of the Boost.System2 solution, I can suggest building multiple Boost.System binaries, one per ABI we can support.

That'd require library name mangling on Linux and adding the std level to the name..

Not necessarilly. The base name of Boost.System with the new ABI could be different.

Wouldn't that require all reverse dependencies to do the same?

Yes, I suppose so. With Boost.System being a core library, I agree that automatic name mangling would make it easier.