Re: [boost] nullptr vs 0

In article <076301d86d77$2c794330$856bc990$@gmail.com>, Peter Dimov via Boost writes:

Compilers apparently are warning on the use of 0 as a null pointer constant, suggesting we use nullptr instead. But compilers don't know that we support C++03 where nullptr isn't a thing.

I couldn't reproduce with clang or gcc. Do you have a repro on compiler explorer? This was my attempt: https://godbolt.org/z/E3f3xnEhM -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline The Terminals Wiki http://terminals-wiki.org The Computer Graphics Museum http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com