Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?

On 4 January 2014 11:34, Niall Douglas wrote:

Also, more controversial features, techniques or ideas which wouldn't pass peer review are deliberately kept till after admission.

Do you have an example of this? IMHO, this seems like it would be an abuse of the trust given to Boost developers. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com (847) 691-1404