Why not derive from std::streambuf overriding appropriate functions? Isn't
it the standard way to deal with custom data streams?
10 авг. 2013 г. 11:42 пользователь "Geoff Shannon"
I emailed the list a while ago that I was starting to work on a named pipe implementation for potential inclusion in the Boost.Interprocess library, and now I finally have some concrete evidence of progress. I've come up with a header file for my proposed interface and I would really appreciate any and all feedback on it.
Particularly, I'm interested in ideas for an appropriate replacement for using char *'s as the data buffers for reading and writing.
As a point of interest this interface is meant to be extremely simple. I don't intend to initially support ANYTHING except for basic creation and reading and writing.
Thanks! -- Geoff
Nothing is ever easy.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost