On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:23 AM Niall Douglas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
nobody has substantially improved upon those docs since then.
And that was many years ago now. Documentation can always be improved of course, but getting the right people to do it is always the hard part.
We have a repository for the new website docs: https://github.com/cppalliance/site-docs And we have a dedicated Staff Writer, Peter Turcan, who maintains this. So if one or more members of the community would like to start this review process doc, even if it is just copying and pasting select quotes from the mailing list (like some of the things in your previous message), it is a start, and Peter can work on filling that out (he might be asking questions if necessary). The logical place to put this information would be in the "Boost Formal Reviews" documentation which is located here in the new website: https://www.preview.boost.org/doc/formal-reviews/index.html The Antora source (which holds the table of contents and individual asciidoc pages) is here: https://github.com/cppalliance/site-docs/tree/develop/formal-reviews/modules... The #boost-docs channel in the Official C++ Slack Workspace ( https://cpplang.slack.com, email me for an invite) is where Peter toils and responds to the community if you want to drop in and have a chat. Thanks Vinnie