Re: [boost] [beast] Formal review

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Vinnie Falco wrote:

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Bjorn Reese via Boost wrote:

...

...

I'll state for the record that I reached out to you and the mailing list a few times since Beast was announced in June 2016, offering any interested parties the opportunity to participate in the design of the library. No one showed up.

For example, I'm doing a mock-up of what a solution to the chunk encoding problem you described might look like, and I have questions which would be simple for an expert like yourself to answer and save me a lot of time (and help create a better product). Here's am example: * Should the new chunk interface require that the chunk exist in memory as a single ConstBufferSequence? * Or is it necessary to support a system where a chunk can be sent using a smaller buffer, periodically refilled?