6 Jul
2017
6 Jul
'17
11:56 a.m.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost
On 07/06/17 02:18, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
My impression though, based on observing earlier discussions, is that tying the address model issue to the architecture issue is a very effective way to stall progress and ultimately do nothing.
Why? I think, breaking the world twice (first by adding address-model to the names, then by adding architecture) is worse than breaking it once (by adding both). There's little difference from the implementation point (I think) and I don't remember there being opposition to adding architecture as well.
This doesn't break the world, does it? Non-Windows isn't affected. Windows auto-linking isn't affected. -- Olaf