Re: [boost] Alternative names to Boost.Fit

On Saturday, March 5, 2016 3:51 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:

...

paul Fultz wrote:

...

My preferred choice:

* Boost.Fn - A library for functions

Frankly, I don't see what's wrong with "Fit" itself. It even starts with F

so you could backronym something if needed.

Perhaps Function Integrated Templates? One issue with Fit, is that when its pronounced in Swedish it means something inappropriate. I really do like the name Boost.Fn, however, others may not like so much, so without a better alternative it might be better to stick with Boost.Fit.