On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely
On 18 June 2013 20:13, Thomas Heller wrote:
Am 18.06.2013 21:09 schrieb "Jonathan Wakely":
On 18 June 2013 19:46, Thomas Heller wrote:
I will support you in your efforts for going for a C++11 based solution under the condition that boost will move on and
deprecate
all libraries that will be unusable with a C++03 compiler. Maybe Boost.AFIO should be the library that advocates and pushes this breaking change.
Huh? You're suggesting deprecating C++11-only libraries before they're even added?
The other way around. Move on with C++11 and get rid of the C++03 cruft.
I'm still confused, now you're advocating making all libraries C++11-only?
Depends. Some might not be needed anymore and most will probably look completely different in C++11
What libraries get deprecated?
Do you mean deprecate C++03 *compilers*?
I mean moving on to C++11, whatever that may mean. I obviously don't have a roadmap for that handy or any idea how such a change might look like. It was simply a statement saying "I would be totally OK to move on to C++11, whatever that means". This has to be properly discussed.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost