2015-06-05 15:28 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski
2015-06-05 0:14 GMT+02:00 Adam Wulkiewicz
: 2015-06-03 17:27 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Krzemienski
: 2015-06-03 14:26 GMT+02:00 Adam Wulkiewicz
Hi,
For passing tests which are expected to pass, if warnings are generated during the compilation they can be seen after clicking on the "pass" link. If the link isn't there it means that there were no warnings. I hope it will allow us to improve the quality of the libraries even more.
This is really good. How about changing the tint of the green color a bit for these cases?
Initially I thought that it might be distracting. But indeed it's more clear this way. So it's done.
Regards, Adam
Adam, Would it be possible to keep the passing tests with warnings green, and only *slightly* change its tint? Currently they are white, and it sends a strong signal that something is wrong with all these tests. I tried to follow the links, but the majority of warnings are silly, buggy, false-positive, or inadequate. For instance "warning: rvalue references are a C++11 extension" I never intend to fix them, and at the same time, I do want to send the message that the library is (or becomes) bug-free with the help of green color.
Sorry for changing my mind like that.
The warnings should be marked with yelowish green color. You were probably seing the tests for master baranch. For a reason unknown to me more time is needed to update the CSS file for master regression results. Please see it again. Is the color ok for you? Or is it too different from the lightgreen used for passing tests? You could also create a PR in Regression setting the color in the CSS file. Regards, Adam