Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs

On 16/08/2017 1:13 p.m., Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Soul Studios via Boost wrote:

...

My main beef with Doxygen is reduced code-readability, which I think has been mentioned a number of times on this list by various others-

Yep, and every time someone brings this up I provide this counter-example of Doxygen-assisted output:

Not sure how that is meant to counter the claim of reduced code readability. It merely seems to demonstrate that Doxygen can be used to generate documentation- which seems obvious.