On 23.10.18 21:02, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
On 2018-10-23 02:58 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:
I cannot agree more. Also, I consider docbook as a perfect example of extremely complex API, and this is why I am very happy with quickbook.
What is your feedback on asciidoc? would you recommend it?
Could we possibly get more off-topic ? The original discussion was about supporting *build systems*.
No. "[release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching" is the title of this thread. I pointed you to cmake scripts that I wrote and that support building quickbook documentation. Have you tried those scripts? What tools you (or anyone else for that
matter) prefer is entirely irrelevant in that context, precisely because a build system needs to support them all.
I remember some people interested in asciidoc, and I believe Rene Rivera is/was one of them. As "a build system needs to support them all", I am asking if he would recommend it, to know if this should be supported in the future. Is there anything wrong? R.