Dear Mateusz,
On 10. Jul 2018, at 19:25, Mateusz Loskot via Boost
wrote: Following some discussion in January this year, Hans Dembinski's Histogram library was scheduled for review in March.
AFAICT, no review happened.
What is the current status of the proposal?
thank you for asking about the status.
Short answer:
The originally scheduled review did not happen, because my review manager dropped out at the last minute. I was not able to find a new review manager quickly, so I decided to work on the library again before rallying up support for a review.
This work is now completed, and I kindly ask the list for support. I need a review manager for histogram.
Github: https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram
Docs: http://hdembinski.github.io/histogram/doc/html/ http://hdembinski.github.io/histogram/doc/html/
Test coverage is 98 %
Benchmarks have been done, the library is very competitive in terms of performance, in addition to being more user-friendly and customisable than the competitors.
Long answer with additional info:
I went into development again, because one pre-review suggestion was to improve STL compatibility, which turned out to be a very important comment that let me rethink some interface design choices. This work is now completed. You can now do things like this:
auto h = make_static_histogram(…); // make 3d histogram
std::vector