21 May
2014
21 May
'14
8:18 p.m.
On 2014-05-21 16:06, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
I think this debate can go on forever so let's just agree that some people prefer DOM, some are pretty happy with SAX, and some would prefer something more convenient and light-weight like a streaming pull parser. I am with the last group.
Yes, that's all fine. What I have been trying to say is that a Boost.XML API will have to be flexible enough to support all of the above. (Note that my sandbox Boost.XML project (which you rightly pointed out as not being a Boost library !) supports a "reader" API, which I think is very much in line with your streaming pull parser. So it should be possible to use libstudxml as a backend for it.) Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...