Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

Antony Polukhin wrote:

I'm writing stacktrace library as a prototype for further adoption into the C++ Standard (I've got big ambitions and groundless optimism). Additional dependency to std::optional could make the adoption harder.

In what way could a dependency on std::optional make the adoption harder? You can't get stacktrace into C++14, can you? C++20 is the earliest possible. And C++17 already has optional. (Of course you could always return pointers instead.)