8 Apr
2013
8 Apr
'13
12:44 p.m.
Do we plan to overload arithmetic operators for Pixel as wrappers of the numeric extension? or should users derive a class from Pixel adding such functionality? ATM, for diving two pixels (rgb_8 for example), I have to call the division this way:
pix_r = pixel_divide_t
().operator()(pix2, pix1); The thing is that I have a template class that makes use of operator/ at some point on one of the template parameters, and I would like to be able to use it with 'Pixel' type.
you cannot just write: pixel_multiply_t< Pixel, Pixel, Pixel > op; Pixel c = op( a, b );