On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Now that building Boost with address-model=32,64 works, I think that we
ought to build both for --build-type=complete on Windows. I'm less sure > about --build-type=minimal, but given that (a) what minimal builds is > determined by the configuration Visual Studio projects use by default > (which is 32 bit) and (b) that we're getting more and more calls for 64 > being built by default, it looks like --build-type=minimal ought to > build both 32 and 64 as well.
that we're getting more and more calls for 64 being built by default,
By default, does that mean with or without --build-type=complete specified?
Without.
So would the default build-type be changed to complete or would a new build-type be introduced for this? Having complete be the default would be most convenient, with minimal allowing you to optimize for space. -- Olaf