Re: [boost] [epochs] Internal relevance in post-C++03 Boost of Boost03 components vs. standard equivalents

I have a half-drafted post that I just haven't been able to finish, but will try to post this weekend. It's a topic that has been much discussed at c++now and other venues where some of us have been fortunate to gather in the past. Overall I think you're on the right track...more to come :) On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:26 AM Joaquin M López Muñoz < joaquinlopezmunoz@gmail.com> wrote:

El 04/06/2020 a las 16:53, Jeff Garland via Boost escribió:

...

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:02 PM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:

...

For those of you who are following the discussion on epochs, I've just prepared a report on the relevance of "legacy" components intra-Boost for these Boost libs that require C++11 (or higher) to work:

https://github.com/joaquintides/boost_epoch/blob/master/boost_vs_std_interna... The link is broken -- the .MD is not capitalized.

https://github.com/joaquintides/boost_epoch/blob/master/boost_vs_std_interna...

Thanks for the heads-up, I changed capitalization and didn't notice that broke the link. Editorial comments aside, your views on the proposal are most welcome.

Joaquín M López Muñoz