On September 24, 2014 5:25:26 AM EDT, "Thijs (M.A.) van den Berg"
On Sep 24, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Rob Stewart
wrote: On September 23, 2014 12:54:28 PM EDT, "Bjørn Roald"
wrote: If you still think there's something to a library that isn't part of a module, please explain. So far, they appear to be synonyms to me. Maybe rgis?
I don't understand that.
I can imagine one could have libraries that depends on well-defined *parts* of other libraries (but not all of it), and that those parts can be called modules. One would not call such a part a library -and also not list it on the public website as a boost library- because its functionality to specific / narrow. For developers is should have a clear identity and not break dependent libraries when refactoring.
Why wouldn't you refer to such things as sublibraries? ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)