8 Apr
2017
8 Apr
'17
2:40 p.m.
Sorry if this has been answered already but what is the incentive to evolve the Boost version instead of the commercial version (or both)? Boost libraries seem like they can be quite labor intensive to maintain, especially libraries targeting specific architectures; is there not a clear conflict of interest with respect to development time being split across a for-pay and a for-free version of the same library?