14 Jan
2019
14 Jan
'19
8:41 p.m.
Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
[Nikita Kniazev]
Bunch of Boost libraries have their own integer_sequence/index_sequence implementation. Wouldn’t it be better if there was boost::integer_sequence/boost::index_sequence?
And how many of them are powered by __make_integer_seq (when available) for throughput?
I haven't bothered because for N=8192 the difference is between 1.0s and 0.7s and doing anything nontrivial with 8192 is probably going to fail anyway, but I might do so if only to be able to answer in the affirmative.