Hello, uBlas would also benefit from that. Although there is already an older implementation in place it can be extended for more uBlas containers. Thanks for bringing it up because I was thinking last night that we hadn't included that in the list provided on the boost gsoc ideas. -Nasos On 04/27/2013 02:21 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Hi,
In case there are some students that are looking for a last idea.
There a re a lot of Boost libraries that don't support move semantics. It would be nice if one student propose to adapt the some of the existing libraries.
The idea is to use Boost.Move so that an emulation is provided for compilers not supporting rvalue references.
Some of the libraries (let me know if I'm wrong are). My priority is given between [], lower numbers means higher priority. Of course others would have others priorities:
C++11 * [0] Tuple or * Fusion/tuple (it seems that it support or will support c++11 move semantics but don't use Boost.Move) * [0] Bind * [1] Function * [2] SmartPtr * [8] Array ?
Accepted for C++14 * [5] optional
Having an active proposal for C++1y * [3] Heaps * [6] Any * [7] Variant
Other * [4] LockFree * [9] Parameters * [10] Signals?
Please help me to complete this list.
Adding constexpre and noexcept would be welcome also.
Best, Vicente
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost