j
k
j a
j l
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Is that acceptable?
Looks much better. I'm assuming allocate_node<U>(Allocator<U>(n1, m1), 1, 'a'); would also work, in which case the interface is as tidy as allocate_shared.
Back to the thread
Back to the list
