Le 30/05/15 00:26, Peter Dimov a écrit :
Niall Douglas wrote:
It's not that I don't like it, I don't see sufficient motivation for > it.
Actually I've changed my mind and now I don't like it. It's a catch(...) without a rethrow, and while those are occasionally necessary, they are not likable.
To be clear, I'm talking about the N4048's .catch_error that takes an exception_ptr, not an error_code.
I'm also not quite sure how it's to be used. Vicente's wording in N4048 > is a bit unclear.
future<X> f1 = async( ... ); future<Y> f2 = f1.catch_error( []( exception_ptr e ) { return > Y(); } );
What happens when f1 has a value?
Surely for catch_error() one must always return the same type of future as the input? Otherwise it couldn't work when f1 has a value.
Vicente in N4048 says that it's not required to return the same type.
If I said that it was an error. Could you point me where? Vicente