Re: [boost] The new Boost 17.0.0

On Dec 2, 2020, at 00:01, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:

OTOH if he is compiling with C++11 on up he is probably using std::random instead of boost::random so your choice is right.

I am providing my new, better RNG in boost::random since convincing LWG to include it in std::random will take some while longer ;) (btw, std:array is not a part of any interfaces of boost::random it is a purely an internal issue which, yes, I know, is not considered as serious)