28 May
2022
28 May
'22
8:01 p.m.
Ruben Perez wrote:
It still freaks me out a little including a header labeled as "detail" - why is it not available as
rather than ? It looks like if the class wasn't supposed to be used in public interfaces.
People objected to its being "officially" added to Core on procedural grounds so it's not yet public. The rule for Core is that it holds things that several other Boost libraries need and have to needlessly duplicate to avoid depending on one another, and adding string_view technically "jumped the line" because it wasn't yet being used anywhere. It's going to be used in JSON and Beast, so we'll hopefully be able to promote it to public at some point, in some form.