23 Apr
2016
23 Apr
'16
5:18 p.m.
On 4/23/16 6:17 AM, Sam Kellett wrote:
that's kinda my point though. it's using boost's name to say "i am of this level of quality" and yet there is no verification of this (such as an accepted boost review).
I see you're point - but I don't think it's currently a big problem. The documentation for libraries review and in the boost library incubator use a logo which is pretty explicit about "proposed for boost" or "Not an official Boost Library". If someone were to include the logo in a way that suggests that it's an official boost library, I'm guessing that it won't take too much internet shaming to fix the situation. Some things are just big enough problems to spend any time trying to fix. Robert Ramey