1 Dec
2020
1 Dec
'20
9:43 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, 00:23 Glen Fernandes
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:16 PM Antony Polukhin.
Wich brings me to a less radical idea: we may simplify acceptance of
dependenceless library clones. Next step would be to provide predefined bcp'ed subsets of libraries (boost 17, boost 23?)
One option is for that other library (DLL for C++17+) to still live under the boostorg/dll repository - i.e. it doesn't need to have its own repository.
You mean folder structure like include/boost/dll/ include/boost/dll17/ Would the bcp treat dependencies of include/boost/dll17 separately from include/boost/dll?