On 3/13/24 12:35 AM, Ion Gaztañaga via Boost wrote:
El 13/03/2024 a las 3:42, Vinnie Falco via Boost escribió:
I would ask everyone who loves Boost to rally and get behind this effort to publish this modern website, to show the onlookers and new potential community members that we are capable of supporting this high-risk / high-reward contribution. The alternative is too dismal to contemplate.
These are good points and the formal review process might not seem a good fit for this, because it's thought for libraries:
https://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html
But it's a formal process that we have to take decisions, so it might work.
Informally, we've been trying to help in the review of the site because discussions in the ML were not well organized. In this informal review process we've asked for changes and I think it worked well.
Since I tried to collect all main comments in a informal-review like process, I volunteer to be the review manager if the community agrees.
Robert, Vinnie, are you ok with this?
Thanks for volunteering as review manager. I would ask that the review wizard take the following actions: a) review the procedures for formal review of libraries and create a version for web site enhancements and other boost tools. Hopefully it would follow the intent and letter of the current process for libraries. b) call for volunteers for review managers and select one and schedule a date. c) I'm tempted to volunteer for review manager myself. But i) it's going to be a lot of work ii) I think I'm much more valuable standing outside pissing into the tent than the opposite. Robert Ramey