Here is a contribution to the review.
Please post your reviews on the mailing list and if possible, answer the following questions:
- Should the library be accepted? Yes - How useful is it? It provides something not otherwise available. - What's your evaluation of - Design This seems to be consistent. - Implementation This also is consistent and clear - Documentations This is where I had problems. I went to the section "Getting Started" in the manual. This I found confusing as it did not contain a simple example. It also contained this statement
"To start with the library you only need to include
- Tests
I installed the library into Boost 1.58.0 and the tests all ran with gcc 4.6 once I had also installed the compiled libraries.
- How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
I have worked to understand the examples in the tutorials and have built tutorials 1 to 3.
- Did you attempt to use the library? On what systems and compilers?
I have the tutorials 1 to 3 running with these systems gcc 4.6 and the compiled libraries for boost 1.58.0 (also compiled with gcc 4.6) clang 3.6 and libc++ 3.6 with C++11. This also uses the compiled libraries compiled with gcc 4.6 except that I have to compile some of the files for boost_filesystem again with clang 3.6. This is because of something to do with the use of wchar in the file "shared_lib_path.hpp". Thank you to Antony Polukhin who helped with my earlier message on this problem. I hope that is helpful. John Fletcher
Thanks, Volodya
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost