8 Feb
2018
8 Feb
'18
3:16 p.m.
On 02/08/18 17:27, degski via Boost wrote:
On 8 February 2018 at 03:20, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The same is possible with library components, although it may incur more overhead. In case of boost/std::function, I would use boost::function or even a custom function wrapper internally (the latter is useful to remove the dependency on Boost.Function). I don't see any advantage of using std::function.
Using std::function has one advantage, though, it's standardised.
In the context of this discussion, it's irrelevant.