17 Aug
2015
17 Aug
'15
10:02 a.m.
2. The current CMake support is easier to use for the reviewers who want to take the library for a test-drive. Using Boost.Build would require that they copy Boost.Http into their Boost source tree. I find it unfortunate to force reviewers to "pollute" their Boost source tree with candidate libraries.
+1 - strongly agree. -- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email.