Hi Mike, On 2018-09-14 07:44 AM, Mike Dev via Boost wrote:
Dear all,
unless I'm encountering an overwhelming resistance to this idea here on the ml, I intend to create a batch of PRs that introduce minimal cmake support to a large subset of boost libraries (maybe even all).
I don't want to come across as rude, but I have to admit that I'm quite annoyed about the still ongoing debate, where everyone remains enclosed in his own mindset. You can look up the arguments in the archives. I can't of course stop you from submitting PRs, but I'm not going to merge a new build logic into my repos if I don't feel comfortable maintaining them. Having to maintain the b2 infrastructure is already painful enough. I can't stress this enough, so I'm repeating it yet again: I'm not against new things added to Boost. I'm against them being added whole-sale, to all of the >150 libs at once. This issue can only be resolved by us collectively stopping to think (and act) as if Boost was a monolith. I don't mind what processes and tools other Boost projects use, but please don't force me to use yours. Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...