On 04/05/2016 10:09 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 04/04/2016 04:27 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
On April 3, 2016 8:53:34 PM EDT, Phil Bouchard
wrote: On 04/03/2016 08:32 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
I still am not getting what root_ptr<someType> is. Is it a replacement for shared_ptr ?
There is no performance loss in using root_ptr/node_ptr over shared_ptr so therefore yes it is a replacement for shared_ptr/weak_ptr.
That isn't quite an answer to his question. If I understand you correctly, the point of your library is to provide a means to manage groups of related memory allocations using a root_pointer. Each related memory allocation is, I presume, a node_pointer created from, or attached to, one root_pointer. Because node_ptrs are grouped and owned by a root_ptr, they are (can be?) destroyed, as a group, when the corresponding root_ptr is destroyed, regardless of cycles.
I adapted the text here: http://philippeb8.github.io/root_ptr/root_ptr/intro.html#root_ptr.intro.root...
And I added important notes and a pitfall to the tutorial: http://philippeb8.github.io/root_ptr/root_ptr/tutorial.html
I was confused by this part of the tutorial: http://philippeb8.github.io/root_ptr/root_ptr/tutorial.html#root_ptr.tutoria... because I didn't see where the function bar was defined even though it is used. -regards, Larry