Re: [boost] [optional] Why was optional<T>::reset() deprecated?

2016-03-02 10:22 GMT+01:00 Andrey Semashev :

On 2016-03-02 11:39, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

...

2016-03-02 9:20 GMT+01:00 Andrey Semashev :

Having 'reset' also allows not to include boost/none.hpp.

...

You cannot avoid including boost/none.hpp. Whenever you include boost/optional/optional.hpp, boost/none.hpp is indirectly included.

Well, at least in the user's code I can avoid it (less typing). But isn't none_t.hpp enough for optional's needs?

Technically, it should be possible to get away with it and create my own constants of type boost::none_t (I think I sometimes need them in expressions). But the total gain would be negligible. Regards, &rzej